HL-CLM-1042 PASS
On 2026-10-25, claims-adjud v5.1 (an internally developed system) produced 'pay' in a NY health claims transaction. Inputs included medical records, claims history. No human reviewed the output before it took effect. The outcome was not adverse to the consumer. RegBench applied 1 rule(s) in force on 2026-10-25 and recorded no findings.
PASS: 0 finding(s) under rules 2026.10+c4982313, corpus 2026-10-30-9c5dad5a. No configured check fired; the case file is recorded. This is not a compliance conclusion. Coverage unsupported: No black-letter rule in the pack covers a NY health claims transaction. Nothing binding was checked, so no disposition here says anything about compliance.
Evidence (carrier asserted). Supplied by the carrier and not verified by RegBench: ai_system.governance_attested, ai_system.model_doc_ref, ai_system.testing_report_ref.
Findings (0)
Point in time
- Law as of
- 2026-10-25
- Rules version
- 2026.10+c4982313
- Corpus snapshot
- 2026-10-30-9c5dad5a
- Engine
- regbench-engine/0.5.0 · deterministic-1
- Fingerprint
- 0adb56e920da6fd0205c3d8a (pattern grouping, not an integrity check)
- Input digest
- 85536180b10d62d8872e8383f640c4ce4347334869d1f215a13dff15a979a3ba
- Evaluated
- 2026-10-31 05:42:55 UTC
- Exhibit C case file
- yes
Ledger
- Entry
- #6545 · assessment · recorded 2026-10-25T22:39:51+00:00
- Hash
- d3589515e3bd03a5b0b66c5b22329f862326c0f78faac58e4677b236f8cef2eb
- Previous
- 391e751f6fe8027deb8ef4615599d46c859d14469d6a366c050652610807af25
- Stored copy intact
- yes, hashes match
- Assessed input intact
- yes, revision 1 matches the input digest
Carrier review
No review item: the disposition was PASS.
Recorded facts revision 1
As asserted by the carrier. References are recorded, not verified: RegBench holds no copy of the documents they name.
- AI system
- claims-adjud v5.1 · internal · high-risk class: claims
- Governance attested
- True
- Testing report
- test://harborline/claims-adjud/2026Q1
- Model documentation
- doc://harborline/claims-adjud/5.1
- Feature classes
- medical_records, claims_history
- Protected factors used
- none
- External data (ECDIS)
- False
- Consumer report / credit
- False / False
- Data sources
- none recorded
- Decision
- pay · score 0.207
- Human review
- none
- Adverse to consumer
- False
- Notice
- not recorded · reasons: False · specific: False · external data disclosed: False
- Appeal channel
- –
- Consumer token
- tok_ba023fe720