{"txn_id":"HL-CLM-1029","assessment_id":"ra_384506917c63412b","occurred_at":"2026-10-07T22:16:48+00:00","state":"NY","line_of_business":"health","stage":"claims","program_area":"Claims/Adjudication","ai_system":{"system_id":"claims-adjud","model_version":"5.1","vendor":"internal","vendor_name":null,"high_risk_class":"claims"},"inputs":{"feature_classes":["medical_records","claims_history"],"protected_factors_used":[],"ecdis_present":false,"consumer_report_used":false,"credit_used":false,"data_source_refs":[],"consumer_token":"tok_06146138a1"},"output":{"decision":"pay","score":0.15,"reason_codes":[],"premium_delta_pct":null},"human_involvement":{"reviewed":false,"reviewer_role":null,"overridden":false},"adverse_action":{"is_adverse":false,"notice_sent_at":null,"reasons_provided":false,"specific_reasons":false,"ecdis_disclosed":false,"appeal_channel":null},"carrier_note":null,"input":{"revision":1,"current_revision":1,"input_digest":"9cc7a84dfc6b4ef8529840ac398bb65f1f6f639ea894393ddadc91a3a9344ec0","digest_ok":true,"note":"input_digest is SHA-256 over the canonical JSON of the transaction revision assessed; it is inside the assessment the ledger hashes."},"assessment":{"disposition":"PASS","coverage":{"status":"unsupported","state_rules_applied":0,"general_rules_applied":0,"advisory_rules_applied":1,"rules_considered":30,"rules_applied":["doctrine.unreviewed-adverse-high-risk"],"statement":"No black-letter rule in the pack covers a NY health claims transaction. Nothing binding was checked, so no disposition here says anything about compliance."},"evidence":{"status":"carrier_asserted","asserted":["ai_system.governance_attested","ai_system.model_doc_ref","ai_system.testing_report_ref"],"missing":[],"statement":"Supplied by the carrier and not verified by RegBench: ai_system.governance_attested, ai_system.model_doc_ref, ai_system.testing_report_ref."},"summary":"PASS: 0 finding(s) under rules 2026.10+c4982313, corpus 2026-10-30-9c5dad5a. No configured check fired; the case file is recorded. This is not a compliance conclusion. Coverage unsupported: No black-letter rule in the pack covers a NY health claims transaction. Nothing binding was checked, so no disposition here says anything about compliance.","narrative":"On 2026-10-07, claims-adjud v5.1 (an internally developed system) produced 'pay' in a NY health claims transaction. Inputs included medical records, claims history. No human reviewed the output before it took effect. The outcome was not adverse to the consumer. RegBench applied 1 rule(s) in force on 2026-10-07 and recorded no findings.","findings":[],"point_in_time":{"as_of":"2026-10-07","basis":"transaction_date","rules_version":"2026.10+c4982313","corpus_snapshot":"2026-10-30-9c5dad5a","engine_version":"regbench-engine/0.5.0","model_version":"deterministic-1"},"evaluated_at":"2026-10-31T05:42:55.809991+00:00","fingerprint":"52e50890d7b8269d84453aa2"},"review":null,"ledger":{"seq":6532,"hash":"59c5ed8155f0af605538615b46228d2bd92a2722e79a29eaa136dab78a6c6731","prev_hash":"513a470a9939ed14b14e909b5f36bec3071906fad0178a5968a19cca61592093","recorded_at":"2026-10-07T22:19:00+00:00"}}